Inside the Texas Heart Studio
Inside the Studio features interviews with special guests visiting The Texas Heart Institute’s TV studio.
From international leaders in the field of cardiovascular medicine to pioneering scientists to community leaders near and far, the Inside the Studio interviews amplify current trends in research and education related to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of heart and vascular disease.
View our website:
texasheart.org
Watch Interview Reels on Texas Heart TV:
tv.texasheart.org/inside-the-studio
Stay Connected with Us:
Inside the Texas Heart Studio
PET Guided Randomized CENTURY Trial and Interventions in Complex CAD
On this episode of Inside the Texas Heart Studio, Dr. Stephanie Coulter sits down with Dr. Lance Gould to discuss the “PET Guided Randomized CENTURY Trial and Interventions in Complex CAD." Dr. Gould is a pioneer in the field of coronary physiology and will discuss his groundbreaking work on PET guided interventions for complex coronary artery disease (CAD).
Key points that Dr. Gould will discuss:
- He reflects on his illustrious career and the evolution of coronary physiology over the past four decades.
- He emphasizes the importance of translating complex physiological data into routine clinical practice through automation and software development.
- Dr. Gould highlights the current need for young investigators to focus on making this knowledge readily available for everyday use, paving the way for the future of cardiology.
For more information on CAD visit texasheart.org/heart-health/heart-information-center/topics/coronary-artery-disease/
🔗Watch the Studio Interview on Texas Heart TV
🔗 Watch Dr. Gould’s Grand Rounds
Watch On Demand Videos on Texas Heart TV
Visit Our Website: texasheart.org
hi I'm Stephanie Coulter and we're
inside the studio at the Texas Heart
Institute and today we have the esteemed
pleasure to welcome Dr Lance GH to our
grand rounds portfolio today and um I'm
super happy to have you here and I'm
want to remind our listeners that we are
happy to have you because you really are
the Godfather of coronary physiology and
you know your esteemed career um looking
at the physiology of coronary flow flow
Reserve coronary flow capacity and how
that relates to how we actually
intervene on people has changed
substantially over the last 40 years um
and in a building that was built by
surgical revascularization techniques so
much has changed um one I'd like to
thank you for coming and two I'd like to
thank you for your esteemed career and
for all that you've given to science and
I'm actually wondering throughout all
this huge amount of data that you've put
into um the development of products that
we we our group uses your technology on
a daily
basis how I'm a educator and I'm
thinking how do we get people to follow
a career path like you did where you
went and followed like I love your slide
where you said this is the slide in 1975
that changed my life and I and you
followed your passion how were you able
to do that well thank you for the honor
it has nothing to do with me really it
has to do with the heart and how it
works and so that passion came from
trying to figure out how the heart works
and then relating it to clinical
medicine and I think that there's a lot
to do there's a lot more to understand
and if people can understand a little
bit of it it and then catch the interest
and the passion for finishing up that
physiology so that it becomes routine
and automated then that's the lesson
that we need to get it's not so much my
personal life it's the story about the
heart oh I okay I love your humility
about that but I have to tell it's real
that's that's that's the way the heart
works well the heart does but humans
follow because we get distracted and but
you stayed focused on the things that
were interesting and entertaining to you
instead of you know being distracted by
you
know positions or administrative jobs
you know what I'm saying this way I
don't know what else to do so I'm a
little bit limited I'm no good at
Administration I'm a pretty good
clinician but in order to be a clinici
they need to understand it so any way
it's an honor but I think the honor
should be focused on the heart and what
other people can discover and then the
complexed problem of where does science
go when it knows the truth but that
truth is so complicated to apply that it
takes um in the modern world a kind of
software uh a technological
automation that carries all that over
into daily life that normal people not
going to spend 50 years trying to figure
it out so the the problem in the future
is not only how you educate but how you
translate this complexity into everyday
normal living now that's a real
challenge every AI person can do that
every teenager that goes up with a
computer can do that you know when I
grew up we had the most thing we had was
a radio and a circular cell phone that's
changed and I think think the modern
world needs to look at it as a
compression of all this data into
automation that's where it's going
that's my current passion but there's
going to have to be some younger people
that take that over are do you think
we're training young people to do this I
mean you have a very robust um operation
with funding and with interesting people
you can't have 25 people in the big
endowment to make this work it needs to
be automated to the extent that two
people a doc and a technologist and
maybe a nurse can make it work and it's
all programs that if you do the right
procedure in the pet skin then the
invasive guys know what he's got he
knows how to fix it so it's a matter of
compressing knowledge and a huge team
into a small package that can be real
that's a real fundamental challenge in
all of medicine and the hearts is you
know a great place to start from a young
investigator
wants to do that that's a major deal
that's a major way of making a career
and if one has an interest in this kind
of uh research that's where the research
needs to go not to ReDiscover coronary
flow Reserve but discover how to
translate it into uh daily practice Yeah
that's the magic of where the SE
research needs to go now but it feels
like you were I mean it may feel to I
don't know I don't want to presume to
say it feels to you
but from my impression of what you were
able to achieve you were able to prove
the physiology and then you've lifted
that physiology up into a place that it
it seems like it's usable data now in
certain in certain in you know instances
it's usable data a lot of people using
it it needs to be better done and
automated automated but understand how
that happened it has something to do
with me but it also has something to do
do with the historical evolution of
science in my generation remember I'm
the postwar Generation midw War
generation there not many
people there are very few people in
academics very few people so there was
this
enormous golf of no people and no uh
knowledge and so in a sense you know we
go in the lab you do something hey
that's pretty cool let's get a paper on
it that all kind of happened because of
when I was born what happened in the war
what happened in the whole idea of
research and how it evolved and so the
current circumstances are similar in a
different way there are now different
tools a different social organization
around medicine a different scientific
base but the opportunity there the
question there
is equally
compelling and there are not too many
people in the modern
Cardiology that can actually bring this
off so that if a young researcher wants
to translate this into clinical
practice the audience is there the
software would be welcome there's
commercial support for doing it and it
will fly and become a daily practice
that then gu
dominates the future of Cardiology
because Cardiology is basically
physiology and if we can compress that
into modern terms of software and
Technology then it'll survive otherwise
all those papers are going to sit in the
library and turn yellow nobody ever
reads it that's life that's the way it
works that's why we got to keep going
forward so what would you what would you
advise for you know how we allocate
funding for kinds of programs like this
this because we we we collectively we
waste a lot of
resources trying to make people better
but not in a very you know
technically cut the knife to the right
spot well approach it is
um when I started one experiment could
tell you where to
go now the proof of this working has to
be done at a societal larger level so
large groups that do this kind of C care
they can make an enormous difference in
practice if there are protocols that
they follow or they try it they learn
they see what's going on will will there
ever be a randomized trial right now
there's not enough groups that actually
do this right that you can do a
multicenter trial so what's happening is
that people are trying it in practice
some of it is in academics a lot of it's
not in academics and they're proving
that it works maybe there will
eventually be a trial but think about
that for a moment the classical
randomized trial are you going to take
somebody with a pet skin that turns
blue and randomize them to no surgery
when you know what's going to
happen so the trick
is the question it's a question can
precise measured physi
ology take the place of the randomized
trial that can never be
done possibly if you had enough big data
for outcomes if you did it could be and
then there could be a special kind of
randomized trial that does what we did
in a centry trial but on a bigger basis
in other words it's not just do you do
pet and no pet and see what happens if
you do pet and you don't and you do the
prevention then you have to make sure
that the BR arm is really well treated
in the es schic arm the adherence to
prevent the treatment was rotten 3% yeah
so in other words you can't test the
procedure you can't test an Imaging
modality as a
strategy unless you know that both the
procedure and the medical treatment are
absolutely optimal and what that means
is in the future will it be diet and and
Statin
or will it be diet and exercise and pck
ks9 that changes the whole ball game and
it changes a threshold at which the
physiologic severity tells you what you
should do but the fundamental tools the
physiologic measurement the refinement
of the strategy that you can't just test
a drug you can't just test a procedure
you can't just test a technology Imaging
you have to put them together in an
integrated strategy that way you do the
strategy and then you don't do the
strategy that would be a trial that
would be feasible because then you're
not assigning somebody that's blue to a
sentence of possible death but if you
include it at a strategy where if
they're bad enough you fix it but then
you do the medical part an expanded
Century trial and multi- Center done
intensely with
pcc9 that's the future and if somebody
has an interest in science and academics
that's what they need to learn how to do
and get involved with but it will be a
team effort the Lone Wolf doing a
procedure and doing an experiment in the
animal lab that's gone it's over it has
to be in society with patients organized
and strategically addressing all the
components of care not just one
piece I think that it's you you you you
bear it down into a more simplified
definition of what the problem is and
then you have to figure out what are the
you know recipes that are available to
help manage that problem and it's going
to take a lot of Society resources and
like you said Co um you know cooperation
between multiple team members to this
thing but it starts with having a
definition so I'm going to thank you
again for helping us to define the
problems that we've been working on
we've made tremendous strides in the
prevention and the treatment of arterial
diseases in the last 30 years I mean oh
absolutely it's huge so for all we've
been able to accomplish with the medical
therapy with surgical techniques with
stenting techniques um we've made a
tremendous impact um on the anthropology
really of coronary disease
that's true you know and um I just want
to thank you for coming and for sharing
your knowledge and your insights with us
today and um I'm proud to call you a
houstonian now oh yes inde yeah indeed
yeah okay well thank you very much my
pleasure thank you so much for coming
great questions thanks very much being
here appreciate it thank
you